Have you Ever been Swept Off Your Feet?

In both cases – whether the bubble was inflated with positive or negative energy – the participants in the bubble are being swept away further and further away from actual physical reality and start to see everything either ‘extremely negatively’ or ‘extremely positively’ – neither experience is grounded in reality – because the physical is neither positive or negative – it just is what it is.

And Then You Crash – Meconomics

In this little series, we’ve been investigating the phenomenon of inflation, how we in our daily lives participate in ‘inflating our reality’ and so, how we are on a personal level participating in the same principles/dynamics that we see playing out on a bigger scale when it comes to inflation, speculative bubbles and financial market crashes.

Welcoming New Life with Living Income Guaranteed

Comfort, security and nurturing are all things we wish are present when a baby comes into this world. Yet, these conditions are not a reality for many babies, as parents themselves like these things in their lives. In Pietermaritzburg, the capital of KwaZulu Natal province in South Africa, 3 to 5 babies are…

Humanity Washed Ashore

This was an excerpt of just one of the stories about the boy. Over the last few days, dozens have been written and published on various major news sites. What is more striking than the content of the posts, is the comments that are left on these articles. What is humanity’s response to such images, to such news?

Voting Fun – What does it Feel Like to Have a Say?

Now – before such increased direct political participation is a reality – let’s do a little test to see what it feels like. So – here are some mock-questions where you’re asked to give your input. Imagine that this relates to your direct reality (eg. your town) – and your answer has a weight that influences the outcome of the decision. Of course, in reality…

Showing posts with label customers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label customers. Show all posts

06 August 2012

Day 59: How Far can We Stretch our Customers? - Part 2

For context, please read: Day 58: How Far can We Stretch our Customers? - Part 1

I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to try to milk my customers as much as I can so that I can earn as much profit as I can - and to be able to do this use the concept of elasticity and if I see that the product I am selling has low price elasticity of demand - I will make the price unnecessarily high, because I know that my customers will pay the higher price anyways.

I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to think 'Suckers!!!!!!' as I raise my price in seeing that the product I am providing has a low price elasticity of demand - because I know that I am fucking over my customers but there is nothing they can do about it, because I am simply following the rules of the free market economy - and thus, I know that I am abusing my fellow human, but can get away with it and within that I feel all powerful and smart because I have got the long end of the straw.

I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to believe that just because I am operating my business in a legal way, that my behaviour is acceptable - instead of seeing, realising and facing the actuality of my actions for what they are: that I am taking advantage of people and what people need.

I forgive myself for not accepting and allowing myself to realise the disgrace and absurdity of an economic system that allows individuals to literally play with the lives of others by raising prices as long as there is enough people that are willing and able to pay the higher price - without considering that there are simply things that HAVE TO be available to everyone, such as housing, food, clean and drinkable water, electricity, education, etc. - just to be able to survive in this world - and thus any economic system where people are left out is unacceptable and must be stopped.

I forgive myself for not accepting and allowing myself to realise that in teaching students of economics what the concept of elasticity means and implies, we are educating the next generation in how to fuck over our fellow human beings, making sure that our legacy of nastiness and spitefulness continues - where we will fuck someone over and then smile and say "hey, it's just business".

I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to abdicate all responsibility for my actions within the economic system to the rules of the game - because: hey, this is how it's done, it's nothing personal, I gotta do what I gotta do - as though the game and its rules can ever exist without its players - not realising that it is the players who play the game that create and sustain the game - and therefore, each and every one is responsible on a personal level for all the atrocities that are accepted and allowed as consequences of playing the game of free trade.

I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to believe that my behaviour of nastiness and spitefulness is acceptable in economics, because everyone's nastiness and spitefulness will 'balance each other out' so that, in the end - the consequences of this spitefulness and nastiness remain limited and contained - without realising and seeing the ridiculousness of such a statement and belief.

I forgive myself for not accepting and allowing myself to realise that our economic system is simply showing us how we have limited ourselves into believing that we'll never be anything else than lying and cheating bastards who will smile in each others' face and then stab each other in the back - and as long as we keep training new generations in the way of Nasty Economics, we ensure that this is all humanity will ever be - instead of just stopping the insanity and commit ourselves to stopping any form of abuse, inequality, atrocity, nastiness, spitefulness, backchatting and backstabbing - and create a world that is a home, rather than a minefield.

I forgive myself for not accepting and allowing myself to realise that we've created our world to be one big minefield where we are living in continuous fear of being fucked over by other people, because we know that's what they do - because we know that's what we do - yet on the surface we will be friendly and cheerful and say 'I love you so much' - because admitting to the reality of the situation and actually facing our fears seems like too daunting a task, not realising that what we're currently saying is: 'let me rather just try and avoid the invisible mines and try to not get blown to pieces' - as though that's such an easy task.

I forgive myself for not accepting and allowing myself to realise that because we suppress our fears of each other every moment of the day, doesn't mean that they are not existent within us and that it is not how we truly experience ourselves - but we rather pretend to be and feel different than who we really are by playing a character of joy and peace and love, continuously suppressing the FEAR that lingers within, until one day we get a burn-out and become depressed and we don't understand why - not realising that how you experience yourself in those moments is how you actually always experience and have experienced yourself inside - as a creature that does not feel, nor know, nor understand joy, peace or love.

I forgive myself for not accepting and allowing myself to realise that I have never really seen or experienced myself as everything that I have suppressed within myself, yet keeps lurking in the darkness - but only ever experienced myself as the various characters that I have designed for myself to be able to cope with my environment and my inner reality for those moments where 'dark thoughts and emotions' creep up to the surface - in the same way that I have never really seen or experienced the world we live in as all the pain, agony and atrocities that happen every day - but only focus on those parts of the world that make me feel better about myself and make me feel like I am living a good life, a happy life - blinded by fear of what I have created and continue creating every moment of the day that I ignore who I am.

05 August 2012

Day 58: Elasticity - How Far Can we Stretch our Customers? - Part 1

In previous blog-posts the concepts of supply and demand were discussed and it was explained how economists use supply and demand curves to predict how the quantity demanded and supplied of goods will change when their prices change. However, so far we've only been able to predict in which direction the quantity demanded for a good or services will change if the price of the good/service changes, or in which direction the quantity supplied will change if the price of the good/service changes (will it go up or will it go down). But to make more accurate predictions, economists require to know by how much the quantity demanded/supplied will change by a certain change in price. In order to do this, a new concept must be introduced, namely: Elasticity.

Elasticity basically measures responsiveness. It is possible that if a price goes down slightly, that the quantity demanded will barely change - in this case we speak of a low level of responsiveness. But it is also possible that if a price goes down slightly, that the quantity demanded will significantly increase - in this case we speak of a high level of responsiveness.

So - with elasticity we're looking at a relation between an action and a reaction - where, the change in price is the action and the change in the quantity demanded/supplied is the reaction.

To calculate elasticity, (take a breath, it's going to be a little technical now - don't worry, it'll soon be over) we divide the percentage change in the reaction by the percentage change in the action. Because two percentages are divided by each other - we end up with simply a number (not a percentage) and this number is referred to as the 'elasticity coefficient'.

Let's make this more tangible by discussing the Price Elasticity of Demand.

The Price Elasticity of Demand

With the price elasticity of demand, the change in price is the action and the change in quantity demanded is the reaction. We know from previous discussions that if the price of a good goes up, the quantity demanded will generally go down (when something becomes more expensive, less people are willing and able to pay the higher price). And - when the price of a good goes down, the quantity demanded generally goes up (when something becomes cheaper, more people are willing and able to pay the lower price). The price elasticity of demand will thus help us assess by how much the quantity demanded of a good goes up or down in response to a change in price.

To calculate the price elasticity of demand, we divide the percentage change in quantity demanded (the reaction) by the percentage change in price (the action). Let's say - the price of petrol goes up by 10%. In response, the quantity demanded of petrol will go down as less people will be willing and able to pay the higher price. But, since many people are currently dependent on petrol to for instance drive to work, it will for many make sense to just pay the higher price, rather than looking for alternative ways to go to work that might take up more time or that are simply not available. Therefore, let's say that the quantity demanded will only go down with only 1%.

The price elasticity of demand for petrol is then calculated as follows: 1% (percentage change in quantity of petrol demanded ) / 10% (percentage change in the price of petrol) = 0.1

Because 0.1 lies between 0 and 1- this result indicates to us that the price elasticity of demand is 'inelastic'. In other words: Even if the price of petrol goes up by quite a large percentage, in comparison, the quantity demanded will not go down by much.

Demand is inelastic when a change in price will cause a smaller change in quantity demanded.

Demand is elastic when a change in price will cause a bigger change in quantity demanded. In case of elastic demand, the elasticity coefficient will be above 1.

Goods with an inelastic price elasticity of demand are often goods that people need, like basic necessities (eg. basic foodstuffs, electricity, water, petrol, etc.), as well as goods that are addictive (eg. tobacco, alcohol, drugs). With basic necessities, a person often simply doesn't have the choice not to pay the higher price. Therefore, if a person knows that the good they are providing/selling is a good with inelastic demand - they can take advantage of the situation by raising the prices as high as possible, because they know people will still pay for it; it's either paying up or endangering one's life. With addictive goods, the same logic is used, because even though prices of these goods are high, the addiction will motivate individuals to keep on purchasing the good, even if they have to sacrifice a lot of money for it.

Goods with an elastic price elasticity of demand are generally luxury goods - meaning: goods that are not necessary for one's survival, such as books, holiday resorts, fast cars, etc. If the price of a luxury goods goes up, many people will be willing to sacrifice having this good in order to have more money available. Or in other words: the price will be a big factor in deciding to acquire luxury goods, whereas with basic necessities - the goods must be purchased de facto and the decision to buy the good is therefore less dependent on the price.

Other points that play a role in determining the price elasticity of demand are:

1. Substitution possibilities
The amount of substitutes available will also play a role int he price elasticity of demand. If there are many substitutes for a product, then instead of paying a higher price, people will simply turn to a cheaper substitute. However, if there are no or only very little substitutes, then people are inclined to keep on buying the same product even if the price rises.

2. The degree of complementarity of the product

The degree of complementarity of a product refers to the tendency of people to use this product together with other products. For instance, you use batteries with appliances - you use salt to spice your food, etc. For goods with a high degree of complementarity (that are often used together with other goods) the price elasticity of demand will tend to be low (inelastic). And the other way around for goods that are used individually.

4. The proportion of income spent on the product

The larger the proportion of income spent on a product, the higher the price elasticity of demand will be (elastic).

One can see that having insight in the price elasticity of demand of the good one is selling gives the seller the opportunity to make the biggest profit possible - and one doesn't have to know much economics to do this, simply considering the points above and assessing what type of product one is selling in relation to these categories will aid a person in milking their customers to give them as much of their money as possible.

We discussed here the price elasticity of demand - the same principle of elasticity can be applied in relation to:
  • The income elasticity of demand (how will the demand for a good change with a change in the income of households?)
  • The price elasticity of supply (how will supply for a good change with a change in the price of the good?)
  • The cross elasticity of demand (how will the demand for a good change if the price of a related good changes? Eg: how will the demand for coffee change if the price for tea changes?)